Wednesday
Jun042008
You should never judge a book by its lack of cover
Wednesday, June 4, 2008
No word on covers yet for HOTEL.
The waiting is not unlike the anticipation of seeing your first child come into the world. Is it going to be all cute and cuddly? Or is it going to show up covered in maconium and sportin' a cone-head. I know, I know--I should just be happy with whatever I get, but let's be honest––while all babies are precious, not all babies are beautiful. In fact, some are downright goofy looking. (I know this becase I've seen my own baby photos, I looked like I popped out of someone's chest cavity ala Alien, but with more hair on my head).
My better half delivers babies for a living, so she's assured me that whatever the literary stork brings us, we will undoubtedly love it. I'm sure she's right.
Jamie |
11 Comments | 

Reader Comments (11)
But bitching about the cover has a long and honorable history that no doubt goes back to complaining about the tubes they stored your scrolls in. It's even popular to contend that one's sales were adversely affected by the choice of cover.
My main complaint about my cover is that there were no blurbs from Stephen King or Ian McEwan. I thought that would have made for a better cover.
I'm looking forward to improving my reading quotient with a purchase of Hotel, too, probably no matter what the cover looks like or what Oprah or Stewart says.
I hope you love your cover, but I'll buy it either way.
Best Wishes.
http://www.hollyollivander.com/innerview//innerview.html
I'm sure your cover will be beautiful. If you don't instantly love it, you will grow to like it.
Rebecca--thanks for the link. Paul Rand is classic old school. Reminds me of my art school days!